![]() ![]() For most nuclei, that would require light of higher energy than suitable lasers can achieve. “Nuclear levels are not normally accessible with lasers,” said theoretical physicist Marianna Safronova of the University of Delaware in a June 2 talk at the meeting. To tally time with nuclei, scientists need to be able to set off the jump between nuclear energy levels with a laser. As a result, nuclear clocks “would be more stable and more accurate,” says theoretical physicist Adriana Pálffy of Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in Germany.īut there’s a problem. ![]() Notably, nuclei are resistant to the effects of stray electric or magnetic fields that can hinder atomic clocks. Nuclear clocks would be based on jumps between those nuclear energy levels, rather than those of electrons. Like the electrons in an atom, the protons and neutrons within atomic nuclei also occupy discrete energy levels. That frequency - the rate of oscillation of the light’s electromagnetic waves - serves as a highly precise timekeeper. To bump electrons in an atom from one energy level to another, an atomic clock’s atoms must be hit with laser light of just the right frequency. According to quantum physics, electrons in atoms can carry only certain amounts of energy, in specific energy levels. That means nuclear clocks could allow new tests of fundamental ideas in physics, including whether supposedly immutable numbers in physics known as fundamental constants are, in fact, constant.Ītomic clocks tally time using the energy jumps of atoms’ electrons. “A nuclear clock sees a different part of the world,” said Thirolf, of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. But “it’s not just about timekeeping.” Unlike atoms’ electrons, atomic nuclei are subject to the strong nuclear force, which holds protons and neutrons together. ![]() But a clock based on atomic nuclei could reach 10 times the precision of those atomic clocks, researchers estimate.īetter clocks could improve technologies that depend on them, such as GPS navigation, physicist Peter Thirolf said June 3 during an online meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. Today’s most precise clocks, called atomic clocks, rely on the behavior of atoms’ electrons. ![]() If physicists can build them, nuclear clocks would be a brand-new type of clock, one that would keep time based on the physics of atoms’ hearts. "In many cases we can't remove these perturbations but we can measure them precisely, we can assess them, and introduce corrections for them." "It's vital for the UK as an economy to maintain a set of standards, a set of procedures, that underpin technical development," he added.Nuclear clocks could be the GOAT: Greatest of all timepieces. "The frequency we measure is not necessarily the one prescribed by the definition of a second, which requires that all the external fields and 'perturbations' would be removed," Szymaniec told BBC News. While that might seem like overegging the pudding in terms of making sure your alarm clock goes off in time for you to get to work, the definition of most electrical units are based on these measurements, and given the vast amounts of energy and data pouring through the world's computer systems, even a tiny change can have measurable economic impact. That level of precision means that NPL's clock wouldn't stray by more than a second in 138 million years. A team led by NPL's Krzysztof Szymaniec and colleagues at Pennsylvania State University found that Britain's atomic clock was accurate to one part in 4,300,000,000,000,000, nearly doubling the accuracy found when the clocks were last measured in 2010. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |